Technical Leadership10 min

Writing Clear RFCs (Request for Comments)

Quick answer

Writing Clear RFCs (Request for Comments) is a practical B2 business English lesson that teaches you to understand the purpose and structure of an RFC. It includes workplace examples, guided rehearsal, and a next-step exercise you can apply to a real meeting, message, interview, or customer conversation.

In this lesson

  • Understand the purpose and structure of an RFC
  • Use "Neutral and Objective" language for technical proposals
  • Distinguish between "Requirements" and "Implementation Details"

Writing Clear RFCs (Request for Comments)

In companies like Uber, Airbnb, and Meta, major technical changes start with an RFC. It's the "Source of Truth" for why a decision was made.

The RFC Structure

  1. Summary: A high-level overview of the proposal.
  2. Motivation: Why are we doing this? What problem are we solving?
  3. Goals & Non-Goals: What is in scope and what is out of scope?
  4. Proposed Design: The technical details (Architecture, API changes, Data models).
  5. Drawbacks: What are the negatives or risks?
  6. Alternatives: What other options did you consider and why did you reject them?

Using RFC 2119 Keywords

Technical writers use specific words to avoid ambiguity:

  • MUST: Absolute requirement. ("The API must return a 404 if the user is not found.")
  • SHOULD: Strongly recommended but not mandatory. ("Clients should cache the response for 5 minutes.")
  • MAY: Truly optional. ("The response may include a 'metadata' field.")

Writing Style: Objective & Precise

Avoid "I think" or "I feel." Use data and logic.

  • Subjective: "I think the current system is slow and bad."
  • Objective: "The current system has a p99 latency of 500ms, which exceeds our 200ms target."

Alex's Tip: The most important section of an RFC is often the "Alternatives Considered." It proves to your peers that you didn't just pick the first idea that came to mind.

Plain words over complex synonyms

| Complex (avoid) | Plain (prefer) | | -------------------- | -------------- | | utilize | use | | facilitate | help | | commence | start | | in order to | to | | due to the fact that | because | | terminate | end |

Plain words are clearer. Save complex vocabulary for when it adds precision.

Define jargon on first use

If you must use technical terms, define them on first use:

  • We use ARR (Annual Recurring Revenue) as our primary growth metric.

After the definition, you may use the short form (ARR). Never assume the reader knows every term.

Structure with headings

Break long documents into sections with clear headings. Readers scan technical docs; they rarely read every word. Headings let them jump to what they need.

  • Use descriptive headings (How to authenticate, not Section 2).
  • Keep sections short.
  • Use lists for steps and options.

Common mistakes

  1. Long, nested sentences. Break them into short ones.
  2. Passive voice everywhere. It hides who did what.
  3. Undefined jargon. It excludes readers who do not know the term.

Practice

Rewrite this unclear sentence in clear technical English:

The utilization of the aforementioned methodology resulted in the successful implementation of the deliverable by the team.

A clear version:

The team used the new method and shipped the feature.

In the next lesson, you will learn to write a Product Requirement Document (PRD).

Apply this lesson

Build a rehearsal brief for work you have this week.

This stays on your device. Bring the brief to Alex, a live session, or the conversation itself.

Key takeaways

  • An RFC is a tool for building consensus on technical decisions
  • Start with the "Problem Statement" and "Goals"
  • Use "Should," "Must," and "May" (RFC 2119) precisely

Check your understanding

1. What is the primary goal of an RFC?
2. In technical standards, what does 'MUST' signify?

Practical questions

Writing Clear RFCs (Request for Comments) FAQ

What does the Writing Clear RFCs (Request for Comments) lesson teach?

It teaches you to understand the purpose and structure of an RFC.

Who should use this Writing Clear RFCs (Request for Comments) lesson?

This lesson is for engineering leaders, technical managers, senior developers working in English across teams, customers, or markets.

What should I be able to do after this lesson?

You should be able to an RFC is a tool for building consensus on technical decisions.

How can I practice writing clear rfcs (request for comments)?

Adapt one example to your current work, say it aloud, then use the rehearsal brief to practice a realistic response with the AI coach or voice lab.

Discuss this lesson

This academy is updated continuously, and recommendations are welcome. Every submission is checked before it appears. Contact details are never published.

Loading approved comments…

Leave a comment

Your name and approved message may appear publicly. Your email is private and lets the moderator follow up.